4.0 Article

Physical therapy for reducing arousal and mechanical restraint among in-patients with mania

Journal

NORDIC JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
Volume 75, Issue 1, Pages 49-53

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08039488.2020.1792981

Keywords

Arousal; mania; mechanical restraint; physical therapy

Categories

Funding

  1. Central Region in Denmark

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that physical therapy significantly reduced the level of arousal among manic patients, leading to a reduction in mechanical restraint as well.
Background From 2003 to 2013 the number of patients exposed to mechanical restraint in Danish psychiatric hospitals was increased. Since, a great effort has been done to reduce mechanical restraint. Objectives The aim of this study was to assess whether physical therapy could lower the level of arousal and reduce mechanical restraint among patients with mania. Methods 170 patients admitted with mania at Aarhus University Hospital were offered physical therapy during the study period from 2017 to 2018. Patients reported their experienced level of arousal before and after physical therapy, rating feelings of tension, ability to be at rest, and feelings of irritability/aggression on Visual Analog Scales. Further, the number of manic patients exposed to mechanical restraint in this period was compared with the two previous years and with patients with other diagnoses. Results Patients' level of arousal was significantly reduced after receiving physical therapy. Further, the study showed a significant reduction in mechanical restraint among patients with mania from 2015 to 2017. Conclusion The results indicate that physical therapy lowers the level of arousal and it is possible that physical therapy contributed to a reduction in mechanical restraint among manic patients. However, the study-design does not allow for confirming this causality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available