4.6 Article

Sucrose synthase determines carbon allocation in developing wood and alters carbon flow at the whole tree level in aspen

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 229, Issue 1, Pages 186-198

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.16721

Keywords

C-13 labelling; aspen; biomass; carbon allocation; Populus; sucrose synthase

Categories

Funding

  1. Bio4Energy (Swedish Programme for Renewable Energy)
  2. Umea Plant Science Centre
  3. Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development (Formas)
  4. Bio4Energy
  5. SSF project ValueTree
  6. Berzelii Centre for Forest Biotechnology - Vinnova

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study reveals the significant impact of SUS on C metabolism and biomass formation in entire trees, confirming its regulatory role in C flow in different tissues and highlighting its importance in wood development.
Despite the ecological and industrial importance of biomass accumulation in wood, the control of carbon (C) allocation to this tissue and to other tree tissues remain poorly understood. We studied sucrose synthase (SUS) to clarify its role in biomass formation and C metabolism at the whole tree level in hybrid aspen (Populus tremula x tremuloides). To this end, we analysed source leaves, phloem, developing wood, and roots ofSUSRNAitrees using a combination of metabolite profiling,(13)CO(2)pulse labelling experiments, and long-term field experiments. The glasshouse grownSUSRNAitrees exhibited a mild stem phenotype together with a reduction in wood total C. The(13)CO(2)pulse labelling experiments showed an alteration in the C flow in all the analysed tissues, indicating that SUS affects C metabolism at the whole tree level. This was confirmed when theSUSRNAitrees were grown in the field over a 5-yr period; their stem height, diameter and biomass were substantially reduced. These results establish that SUS influences C allocation to developing wood, and that it affects C metabolism at the whole tree level.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available