4.3 Article

Behavioral Survey of Effects of Pulsed Radiofrequency on Neuropathic and Nociceptive Pain in Rats: Treatment Profile and Device Implantation

Journal

NEUROMODULATION
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages 1458-1466

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ner.13169

Keywords

Pulsed radiofrequency; neuropathic pain; nociceptive pain; implantation; rats

Funding

  1. National Science Council in Taiwan [NSC99-2628-B-039-008-MY2, NSC101-2314-B039-005-MY3]
  2. National Research Program for Biopharmaceuticals [DOH101-TD-PB-111-NSC006]
  3. China Medical University [DMR-107-081, DMR-108-213]
  4. Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan [MOHW107-TDU-B-212-123,004]
  5. China Medical University under the Aim for Top University Plan of the Ministry of Education in Taiwan
  6. E-Da Hospital/National Taiwan University Hospital Joint Research Program [103-END14]
  7. China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Both bipolar and unipolar PRF showed similar effectiveness in alleviating neuropathic or inflammatory pain, with bipolar PRF requiring much lower electrical power. Repetitive PRF stimulations had analogous effects without demonstrating analgesic tolerance or neurological deficits.
Objectives Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) stimulation is widely used for intractable pain; however, there is no consensus on treatment protocols and appropriate types of pain. We compared effectiveness of bipolar and unipolar PRF on neuropathic or inflammatory pains, and of targets at the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) and sciatic nerve (SN). We also examined efficacy of repetitive PRF stimulations. This preclinical study could serve as an extensive survey before human trials. Materials Spare nerve injury (SNI)-induced neuropathic pain and complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) injection-induced inflammatory pain were used. Behavioral responses were measured using von Frey test, acetone test, and Hargreave's test at preinjury and postinjury time points. In both models, we evaluated results of DRG stimulation with unipolar PRF (45 V) versus bipolar PRF (5 V), stimulation at DRG vs. SN, and repetitive stimulations. Results Both unipolar and bipolar PRFs reduced SNI- or CFA-induced pain for a similar duration. In the SNI model, PRF-DRG had a stronger effect on tactile pain than PRF-SN but lower effect on cold allodynia, whereas in the CFA model PRF-DRG and PRF-SN showed similar effects. Repetitive PRF stimulation, by open technique or implantation method, produced analogous effect by each stimulus, and no evident analgesic tolerance or neurological deficit was shown. Conclusions PRF temporarily attenuates neuropathic and inflammatory pain. Bipolar PRF generates significant analgesia with a much lower electrical power than unipolar PRF. Meanwhile, the minor variant effects between PRF-DRG and PRF-SN may indicate distinct mechanisms. The sustained-analgesia by repetitive treatments suggests implantation technique could be a promising choice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available