4.6 Article

Probing changes in corticospinal excitability following theta burst stimulation of the human primary motor cortex

Journal

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 127, Issue 1, Pages 740-747

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.06.014

Keywords

Transcranial magnetic stimulation; cTBS; iTBS; Motor evoked potential; Input/output curve; Plasticity

Funding

  1. Alzheimer's Australia Dementia Research Foundation (AADRF) Postdoctoral Fellowship
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Australian Biomedical (Training) Fellowships [1088295, 1016379]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To determine whether the intensity of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) used to probe changes in corticospinal excitability influences the measured plasticity response to theta burst stimulation (TBS) of the human primary motor cortex. Methods: Motor evoked potential (MEP) input/output (I/O) curves were recorded before and following continuous TBS (cTBS) (Experiment 1; n = 18) and intermittent TBS (iTBS) (Experiment 2; n = 18). Results: The magnitude and consistency of MEP depression induced by cTBS was greatest when probed using stimulus intensities at or above 150% of resting motor threshold (RMT). In contrast, facilitation of MEPs following iTBS was strongest and most consistent at 110% of RMT. Conclusions: The plasticity response to both cTBS and iTBS is influenced by the stimulus intensity used to probe the induced changes in corticospinal excitability. Significance: The results highlight the importance of the test stimulus intensity used to assess TBS-induced changes in corticospinal excitability when interpreting neuroplasticity data, and suggest that a number of test intensities may be required to reliably probe the plasticity response. (C) 2015 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available