4.4 Review

Reproducibility of animal research in light of biological variation

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages 384-393

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41583-020-0313-3

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [IZSEZ0_184010, 310030_179254]
  2. European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme
  3. European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (Innovative Medicines Initiative, IMI2) [777364]
  4. Linnaeus University
  5. German Research Foundation [INST 215/543-1, 396782608]
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [310030_179254, IZSEZ0_184010] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this Perspective, Hanno Wurbel and colleagues argue that a disregard for incorporating biological variation in study design is an important cause of poor reproducibility in animal research. They put the case for the use of systematic heterogenization of study samples and conditions in studies to improve reproducibility. Context-dependent biological variation presents a unique challenge to the reproducibility of results in experimental animal research, because organisms' responses to experimental treatments can vary with both genotype and environmental conditions. In March 2019, experts in animal biology, experimental design and statistics convened in Blonay, Switzerland, to discuss strategies addressing this challenge. In contrast to the current gold standard of rigorous standardization in experimental animal research, we recommend the use of systematic heterogenization of study samples and conditions by actively incorporating biological variation into study design through diversifying study samples and conditions. Here we provide the scientific rationale for this approach in the hope that researchers, regulators, funders and editors can embrace this paradigm shift. We also present a road map towards better practices in view of improving the reproducibility of animal research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available