4.8 Article

Undulation enables gliding in flying snakes

Journal

NATURE PHYSICS
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages 974-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41567-020-0935-4

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [1351322, 1537349, 1922516, 0966125]
  2. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  3. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems [1922516] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Direct For Education and Human Resources
  5. Division Of Graduate Education [0966125] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Observations of flying snakes inform the development of a dynamical model of gliding taking undulation into account. This work suggests that aerial undulation has a different function in snakes than in other animals. When flying snakes glide, they use aerial undulation. To determine if aerial undulation is a flight control strategy or a non-functional behavioural vestige of lateral undulation, we measured snake glides using high-speed motion capture and developed a new dynamical model of gliding. Reconstructions of the snake's wing-body reveal that aerial undulation is composed of horizontal and vertical waves, whose phases differ by 90 degrees and whose frequencies differ by a factor of two. Using these results, we developed a three-dimensional mathematical model of snake flight that incorporates aerodynamic and inertial effects. Although simulated glides without undulation attained some horizontal distance, they are biologically unrealistic because they failed due to roll and pitch instabilities. In contrast, the inclusion of undulation stabilized the rotational motion and markedly increased glide performance. This work demonstrates that aerial undulation in snakes serves a different function than known uses of undulation in other animals, and suggests a new template of control for dynamic flying robots.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available