4.7 Article

Impaired mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation limits the self-renewal of T cells exposed to persistent antigen

Journal

NATURE IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages 1022-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41590-020-0725-2

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Burroughs Wellcome Fund Career Award for Medical Scientists
  2. Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy
  3. Burroughs Wellcome Fund
  4. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Support Grant [P30 CA008748, AI140472-01A1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thompson and colleagues show that repetitive antigenic stimulation within the tumor environment triggers mitochondrial dysfunction by inhibiting oxidative phosphorylation, which leads to T cell exhaustion. The majority of tumor-infiltrating T cells exhibit a terminally exhausted phenotype, marked by a loss of self-renewal capacity. How repetitive antigenic stimulation impairs T cell self-renewal remains poorly defined. Here, we show that persistent antigenic stimulation impaired ADP-coupled oxidative phosphorylation. The resultant bioenergetic compromise blocked proliferation by limiting nucleotide triphosphate synthesis. Inhibition of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation in activated T cells was sufficient to suppress proliferation and upregulate genes linked to T cell exhaustion. Conversely, prevention of mitochondrial oxidative stress during chronic T cell stimulation allowed sustained T cell proliferation and induced genes associated with stem-like progenitor T cells. As a result, antioxidant treatment enhanced the anti-tumor efficacy of chronically stimulated T cells. These data reveal that loss of ATP production through oxidative phosphorylation limits T cell proliferation and effector function during chronic antigenic stimulation. Furthermore, treatments that maintain redox balance promote T cell self-renewal and enhance anti-tumor immunity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available