4.8 Article

Back-propagating supershear rupture in the 2016Mw7.1 Romanche transform fault earthquake

Journal

NATURE GEOSCIENCE
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages 647-+

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41561-020-0619-9

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) [NE/K010654/1]
  2. NERC [NE/K010654/1, NE/M003507/1, NE/M004643/1]
  3. European Research Council [GA 638665]
  4. German Research Foundation (DFG) [276464525]
  5. Czech Science Foundation [GACR-18-06716J]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

How an earthquake rupture propagates strongly influences the potentially destructive ground shaking. Complex ruptures often involve slip along multiple faults, which masks information on the frictional behaviour of fault zones. Geometrically smooth ocean transform fault plate boundaries offer a favourable environment to study fault dynamics, because strain is accommodated along a single, wide fault zone that offsets the homogeneous geology. Here we present an analysis of the 2016M(w) 7.1 earthquake on the Romanche fracture zone in the equatorial Atlantic, using data from both nearby seafloor seismometers and global seismic networks. We show that this rupture had two phases: (1) upward and eastward propagation towards a weaker region where the transform fault intersects the mid-ocean ridge, and then (2) an unusual back-propagation westwards at a supershear speed towards the centre of the fault. We suggest that deep rupture into weak fault segments facilitated greater seismic slip on shallow locked zones. This highlights that even earthquakes along a single distinct fault zone can be highly dynamic. Observations of back-propagating ruptures are sparse, and the possibility of reverse propagation is largely absent in rupture simulations and unaccounted for in hazard assessments. In one earthquake, an oceanic transform fault ruptured in one direction and then backwards at a speed exceeding that of shear-wave propagation, according to an analysis of data recorded by nearby seafloor and global seismometers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available