4.8 Article

Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in Europe

Journal

NATURE
Volume 584, Issue 7820, Pages 257-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2405-7

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIHR BRC Imperial College NHS Trust
  2. Academy of Medical Sciences Springboard award
  3. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  4. UK Royal Society fellowship
  5. UK Medical Research Council under UK Department for International Development
  6. NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Modelling Methodology
  7. Community Jameel
  8. University of Edinburgh
  9. EPSRC [EP/P020267/1]
  10. MRC [MR/R015600/1, MC_PC_19012] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Modelling based on pooled data from 11 European countries indicates that non-pharmaceutical interventions-particularly lockdowns-have had a marked effect on SARS-CoV-2 transmission, driving the reproduction number of the infection below 1. Following the detection of the new coronavirus(1)severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and its spread outside of China, Europe has experienced large epidemics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In response, many European countries have implemented non-pharmaceutical interventions, such as the closure of schools and national lockdowns. Here we study the effect of major interventions across 11 European countries for the period from the start of the COVID-19 epidemics in February 2020 until 4 May 2020, when lockdowns started to be lifted. Our model calculates backwards from observed deaths to estimate transmission that occurred several weeks previously, allowing for the time lag between infection and death. We use partial pooling of information between countries, with both individual and shared effects on the time-varying reproduction number (R-t). Pooling allows for more information to be used, helps to overcome idiosyncrasies in the data and enables more-timely estimates. Our model relies on fixed estimates of some epidemiological parameters (such as the infection fatality rate), does not include importation or subnational variation and assumes that changes inR(t)are an immediate response to interventions rather than gradual changes in behaviour. Amidst the ongoing pandemic, we rely on death data that are incomplete, show systematic biases in reporting and are subject to future consolidation. We estimate that-for all of the countries we consider here-current interventions have been sufficient to driveR(t)below 1 (probabilityR(t) < 1.0 is greater than 99%) and achieve control of the epidemic. We estimate that across all 11 countries combined, between 12 and 15 million individuals were infected with SARS-CoV-2 up to 4 May 2020, representing between 3.2% and 4.0% of the population. Our results show that major non-pharmaceutical interventions-and lockdowns in particular-have had a large effect on reducing transmission. Continued intervention should be considered to keep transmission of SARS-CoV-2 under control.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available