4.8 Article

Lineage dynamics of the endosymbiotic cell type in the soft coralXenia

Journal

NATURE
Volume 582, Issue 7813, Pages 534-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2385-7

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  2. Aquatic Symbiosis [GBMF9198]
  3. NIH/NIGMS [GM106023, GM110151]
  4. NIH/NIAMS [AR060042, AR071976]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many corals harbour symbiotic dinoflagellate algae. The algae live inside coral cells in a specialized membrane compartment known as the symbiosome, which shares the photosynthetically fixed carbon with coral host cells while host cells provide inorganic carbon to the algae for photosynthesis(1). This endosymbiosis-which is critical for the maintenance of coral reef ecosystems-is increasingly threatened by environmental stressors that lead to coral bleaching (that is, the disruption of endosymbiosis), which in turn leads to coral death and the degradation of marine ecosystems(2). The molecular pathways that orchestrate the recognition, uptake and maintenance of algae in coral cells remain poorly understood. Here we report the chromosome-level genome assembly of aXeniaspecies of fast-growing soft coral(3), and use this species as a model to investigate coral-alga endosymbiosis. Single-cell RNA sequencing identified 16 cell clusters, including gastrodermal cells and cnidocytes, inXeniasp. We identified the endosymbiotic cell type, which expresses a distinct set of genes that are implicated in the recognition, phagocytosis and/or endocytosis, and maintenance of algae, as well as in the immune modulation of host coral cells. By couplingXeniasp. regeneration and single-cell RNA sequencing, we observed a dynamic lineage progression of the endosymbiotic cells. The conserved genes associated with endosymbiosis that are reported here may help to reveal common principles by which different corals take up or lose their endosymbionts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available