4.8 Article

Strain engineering in single-, bi- and tri-layer MoS2, MoSe2, WS2 and WSe2

Journal

NANO RESEARCH
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages 1698-1703

Publisher

TSINGHUA UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-020-2918-2

Keywords

two-dimensional (2D) materials; transition metal dichalcogenides; strain engineering; band gap; differential reflectance

Funding

  1. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union [755655]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness [2017 FJCI-2017-32919]
  3. China Scholarship Council (CSC) [201907040070]
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [755655] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research utilizes strain to modify the optical properties of semiconducting transition metal dichalcogenides, with a focus on MoS2, MoSe2, WS2, and WSe2. The study provides detailed technical descriptions for performing uniaxial strain measurements and proposes a calibration method for accurately determining the applied strain. Reflectance spectroscopy is then employed to analyze the strain tunability of electronic properties in single-, bi-, and tri-layer MoS2, MoSe2, WS2, and WSe2, with an assessment of flake-to-flake variability in 15 single-layer MoS2 flakes.
Strain is a powerful tool to modify the optical properties of semiconducting transition metal dichalcogenides like MoS2, MoSe2, WS2 and WSe2. In this work we provide a thorough description of the technical details to perform uniaxial strain measurements on these two-dimensional semiconductors and we provide a straightforward calibration method to determine the amount of applied strain with high accuracy. We then employ reflectance spectroscopy to analyze the strain tunability of the electronic properties of single-, bi- and tri-layer MoS2, MoSe2, WS2 and WSe2. Finally, we quantify the flake-to-flake variability by analyzing 15 different single-layer MoS2 flakes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available