4.7 Article

Completeness of the Gaia verse II: what are the odds that a star is missing from Gaia DR2?

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 497, Issue 4, Pages 4246-4261

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa2305

Keywords

methods: data analysis; methods: statistical; stars: statistics; Galaxy: kinematics and dynamics; Galaxy: stellar content

Funding

  1. Magdalen College
  2. Rudolf Peierls Centre for Theoretical Physics
  3. Science and Technology Facilities Council of the United Kingdom

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The second data release of the Gaia mission contained astrometry and photometry for an incredible 1692 919 135 sources, but how many sources did Gaia miss and where do they lie on the sky? The answer to this question will be crucial for any astronomer attempting to map the Milky Way with Gaia DR2. We infer the completeness of Gaia DR2 by exploiting the fact that it only contains sources with at least five astrometric detections. The odds that a source achieves those five detections depends on both the number of observations and the probability that an observation of that source results in a detection. We predict the number of times that each source was observed by Gaia and assume that the probability of detection is either a function of magnitude or a distribution as a function of magnitude. We fit both these models to the 1.7 billion stars of Gaia DR2, and thus are able to robustly predict the completeness of Gaia across the sky as a function of magnitude. We extend our selection function to account for crowding in dense regions of the sky, and show that this is vitally important, particularly in the Galactic bulge and the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds. We find that the magnitude limit at which Gaia is still 99 per cent complete varies over the sky from G = 18.9 to fainter than G = 21. We have created a new PYTHON package SELECTIONFUNCTIONS (https://github.com/gaiaverse/selectionfunctions) which provides easy access to our selection functions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available