4.7 Article

New empirical constraints on the cosmological evolution of gas and stars in galaxies

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 496, Issue 2, Pages 1124-1131

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa1565

Keywords

galaxies: evolution; galaxies: high-redshift; galaxies: star formation

Funding

  1. Black Hole Initiative at Harvard University - JTF
  2. Black Hole Initiative at Harvard University - GBMF

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We combine the latest observationally motivated constraints on stellar properties in dark matter haloes, along with data-driven predictions for the atomic (H1) and molecular (H-2) gas evolution in galaxies, to derive empirical relationships between the build-up of galactic components and their evolution over cosmic time. At high redshift (z greater than or similar to 4), the frameworks imply that galaxies acquire their cold gas (both atomic and molecular) mostly by accretion, with the fraction of cold gas reaching about 20 per cent of the cosmic baryon fraction. We infer a strong dependence of the star formation rate on the H2 mass, suggesting a near-universal depletion time-scale of 0.1-1 Gyr in Milky Way-sized haloes (of masses 10(12 )M(circle dot )at z = 0). There is also evidence for a near-universality of the Kennicutt-Schmidt relation across redshifts, with very little dependence on stellar mass, if a constant conversion factor (alpha(co)) of CO luminosity to molecular gas mass is assumed. Combining the atomic and molecular gas observations with the stellar build-up illustrates that galactic mass assembly in Milky Way-sized haloes proceeds from smooth accretion at high redshifts towards becoming merger-dominated at late times (z less than or similar to 0.6). Our results can be used to constrain numerical simulations of the dominant growth and accretion processes of galaxies over cosmic history.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available