4.6 Article

Slower growth ofEscherichia colileads to longer survival in carbon starvation due to a decrease in the maintenance rate

Journal

MOLECULAR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/msb.20209478

Keywords

bacterial fitness; bacterial survival; bacterial systems biology; death rate; quantitative physiology

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) via the priority program SPP1617
  2. DFG fellowship through the Graduate School of Quantitative Biosciences Munich (QBM)
  3. European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO) [ALTF 782-2017]
  4. German Research Foundation (DFG) via the Transregio 174 Spatiotemporal dynamics of bacterial cells

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fitness of bacteria is determined both by how fast cells grow when nutrients are abundant and by how well they survive when conditions worsen. Here, we study how prior growth conditions affect the death rate ofEscherichia coliduring carbon starvation. We control the growth rate prior to starvation either via the carbon source or via a carbon-limited chemostat. We find a consistent dependence where death rate depends on the prior growth conditions only via the growth rate, with slower growth leading to exponentially slower death. Breaking down the observed death rate into two factors, maintenance rate and recycling yield, reveals that slower growing cells display a decreased maintenance rate per cell volume during starvation, thereby decreasing their death rate. In contrast, the ability to scavenge nutrients from carcasses of dead cells (recycling yield) remains constant. Our results suggest a physiological trade-off between rapid proliferation and long survival. We explore the implications of this trade-off within a mathematical model, which can rationalize the observation that bacteria outside of lab environments are not optimized for fast growth.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available