4.8 Article

Amphetamine sensitization alters hippocampal neuronal morphology and memory and learning behaviors

Journal

MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY
Volume 26, Issue 9, Pages 4784-4794

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41380-020-0809-2

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. PRODEP [CA-BUAP-120]
  2. CONACYT [252808]
  3. MINECO/FEDER [BFU2012-38208]
  4. Junta de Andalucia [P11-CVI-7290]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that AMPH treatment leads to a decrease in neuronal density in the hippocampus, affecting short- and long-term memory, while also causing morphological changes and oxidative stress.
It is known that continuous abuse of amphetamine (AMPH) results in alterations in neuronal structure and cognitive behaviors related to the reward system. However, the impact of AMPH abuse on the hippocampus remains unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the damage caused by AMPH in the hippocampus in an addiction model. We reproduced the AMPH sensitization model proposed by Robinson et al. in 1997 and performed the novel object recognition test (NORt) to evaluate learning and memory behaviors. After the NORt, we performed Golgi-Cox staining, a stereological cell count, immunohistochemistry to determine the presence of GFAP, CASP3, and MT-III, and evaluated oxidative stress in the hippocampus. We found that AMPH treatment generates impairment in short- and long-term memories and a decrease in neuronal density in the CA1 region of the hippocampus. The morphological test showed an increase in the total dendritic length, but a decrease in the number of mature spines in the CA1 region. GFAP labeling increased in the CA1 region and MT-III increased in the CA1 and CA3 regions. Finally, we found a decrease in Zn concentration in the hippocampus after AMPH treatment. An increase in the dopaminergic tone caused by AMPH sensitization generates oxidative stress, neuronal death, and morphological changes in the hippocampus that affect cognitive behaviors like short- and long-term memories.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available