4.3 Article

Olfactory function in acute traumatic brain injury

Journal

CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY
Volume 140, Issue -, Pages 68-72

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.11.013

Keywords

Craniocerebral trauma; Smell; Olfaction; Olfactory perception

Funding

  1. Research Center of Sacre-Coeur Hospital, Montreal
  2. University of Quebec in Trois-Rivieres
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (Canada)
  4. Fonds de Recherche du Quebec - Sante
  5. University of Montreal
  6. Research Institute of the McGill University Hospital Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) represents a significant public health problem and is associated with a high rate of mortality and morbidity. Although TBI is amongst the most common causes of olfactory dysfunction the relationship between injury severity and olfactory problems has not yet been investigated with validated and standardized methods in the first days following the TBI. Methods: We measured olfactory function in 63 patients admitted with TBI within the first 12 days following the trauma by means of the Sniffin' Sticks identification test (quantitative assessment) and a parosmia questionnaire (qualitative assessment). TBI severity was determined by means of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and by duration of post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) as measured by the Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test. Results: Poor olfactory scores correlated with a longer amnesia period, but not with GCS scores. Further, we observed higher parosmia scores in assault victims than in victims of falls or motor vehicle collisions. Conclusions: We show that PTA is intimately related to olfactory problems following a TBI. Thus, a thorough evaluation of olfaction is essential in order to detect posttraumatic olfactory dysfunction and to take appropriate actions early on to help the individual deal with this impairment. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available