4.7 Article

Systematic identification and elimination of flux bottlenecks in the aldehyde production pathway of Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942

Journal

METABOLIC ENGINEERING
Volume 60, Issue -, Pages 56-65

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymben.2020.03.007

Keywords

Cyanobacteria; Isobutyraldehyde; Photoautotrophic metabolism; Metabolic flux analysis; Pyruvate; Phosphoenolpyruvate; Stable isotope

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy Genomic Science Program [DE-SC0019404]
  2. National Institutes of Health [R37 GM067152, R01 GM107434]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0019404] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Isotopically nonstationary metabolic flux analysis (INST-MFA) provides a versatile platform to quantitatively assess in vivo metabolic activities of autotrophic systems. By applying INST-MFA to recombinant aldehyde-producing cyanobacteria, we identified metabolic alterations that correlated with increased strain performance in order to guide rational metabolic engineering. We identified four reactions adjacent to the pyruvate node that varied significantly with increasing aldehyde production: pyruvate kinase (PK) and acetolactate synthase (ALS) fluxes were directly correlated with product formation, while pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PPC) fluxes were inversely correlated. Overexpression of enzymes for PK or ALS did not result in further improvements to the previous best-performing strain, while downregulation of PDH expression (through antisense RNA expression) or PPC flux (through expression of the reverse reaction, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase) provided significant improvements. These results illustrate the potential of INST-MFA to enable a systematic approach for iterative identification and removal of pathway bottlenecks in autotrophic host cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available