4.3 Article

Gamma knife radiosurgery for brainstem cavernous malformations

Journal

CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY
Volume 151, Issue -, Pages 55-60

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.09.018

Keywords

Cavernous malformation; Gamma knife surgery; Annual hemorrhage rate; Stereotactic radiosurgery; Brainstem

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The goal of this retrospective study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gamma knife radiosurgery (GKS) for the treatment of brainstem cavernous malformations (CMs) Methods: Between January of 2009 and December of 2014, 43 patients (20 males and 23 females) with brainstem CMs were treated at the West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Gamma Knife Center. The mean age of these patients was 41.7 years. All of the patients experienced 1 or more episodes of symptomatic bleeding (range 1-4) before undergoing GKS. The mean volume of the malformations at the time of GKS was 442.1 mm(3), and the mean prescribed marginal radiation dose was 11.9 Gy. The mean follow-up period after radiosurgery was 36 months (range 12-120 months). Results: Before GKS, 50 hemorrhages (1.2 per patient) were observed (25.0% annual hemorrhage rate). Three hemorrhages following GKS were observed within the first 2 years (3.92% annual hemorrhage rate), and 1 hemorrhage was observed in the period after the first 2 years (1.85% annual hemorrhage rate). In this study of 43 patients, new neurological deficits developed in only 1 patient (2.32%; permanent paresthesia on the left side of the face and the right lower limb of the patient). There were no deaths in this study. Conclusion: GKS is a favorable alternative treatment for brainstem CMs. Using a low marginal dose treatment might reduce the rate of hemorrhage and radiation-induced complications. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available