4.7 Review

Emerging bacterial pathogens: the past and beyond

Journal

CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages 12-21

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.10.010

Keywords

Disease causation; emerging bacteria; emerging infectious diseases; intracellular bacteria; Koch postulates; zoonoses

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Since the 1950s, medical communities have been facing with emerging and reemerging infectious diseases, and emerging pathogens are now considered to be a major microbiologic public health threat. In this review, we focus on bacterial emerging diseases and explore factors involved in their emergence as well as future challenges. We identified 26 major emerging and reemerging infectious diseases of bacterial origin; most of them originated either from an animal and are considered to be zoonoses or from water sources. Major contributing factors in the emergence of these bacterial infections are: (1) development of new diagnostic tools, such as improvements in culture methods, development of molecular techniques and implementation of mass spectrometry in microbiology; (2) increase in human exposure to bacterial pathogens as a result of sociodemographic and environmental changes; and (3) emergence of more virulent bacterial strains and opportunistic infections, especially affecting immunocompromised populations. A precise definition of their implications in human disease is challenging and requires the comprehensive integration of microbiological, clinical and epidemiologic aspects as well as the use of experimental models. It is now urgent to allocate financial resources to gather international data to provide a better understanding of the clinical relevance of these waterborne and zoonotic emerging diseases. (C) 2015 Clinical Microbiology and Infection published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available