4.6 Article

FecalNet: Automated detection of visible components in human feces using deep learning

Journal

MEDICAL PHYSICS
Volume 47, Issue 9, Pages 4212-4222

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mp.14352

Keywords

automatic identification; deep learning; Fecal components; FecalNet; neural network

Funding

  1. Shenzhen Science and Technology Project [JCYJ20170302152605463, JCYJ20170306123423907, JCYJ20180507182025817]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China-Shenzhen Joint Fund Project [U1713220]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose To automate the detection and identification of visible components in feces for early diagnosis of gastrointestinal diseases, we propose FecalNet, a method using multiple deep neural networks. Methods FecalNet uses the ResNet152 residual network to extract and learn the characteristics of visible components in fecal microscopic images, acquire feature maps in combination with the feature pyramid network, apply the full convolutional network to classify and locate the fecal components, and implement the improved focal loss function to reoptimize the classification results. This allowed the complete automation of the detection and identification of the visible components in feces. Results We validated this method using a fecal database of 1,122 patients. The results indicated a mean average precision (mAP) of 92.16% and an average recall (AR) of 93.56%. The average precision (AP) and AR of erythrocyte, leukocyte, intestinal mucosal epithelial cells, hookworm eggs, ascarid eggs, and whipworm eggs were 92.82% and 93.38%, 93.99% and 96.11%, 90.71% and 92.41%, 89.95% and 93.88%, 96.90% and 91.21%, and 88.61% and 94.37%, respectively. The average times required by the GPU and the CPU to analyze a fecal microscopic image are approximately 0.14 and 1.02 s, respectively. Conclusion FecalNet can automate the detection and identification of visible components in feces. It also provides a detection and identification framework for detecting several other types of cells in clinical practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available