Journal
CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA
Volume 16, Issue 7, Pages 417-+Publisher
CIG MEDIA GROUP, LP
DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2016.04.001
Keywords
AML; Germ line; HCS; Inherited; MDS; Predisposition
Categories
Funding
- UTMDACC [CA016672]
- Jeanne F. Shelby Scholarship Fund
- Cancer Research Foundation
- [R01AI06946]
- [K08 HL129088]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The clinical importance and anticipated results of genetic counseling and testing for hereditary cancer syndromes in patients with hematologic malignancies is poorly defined. We evaluated 67 patients referred to the Hereditary Hematologic Malignancy Clinic. A cancer predisposition syndrome was confirmed in 12 patients (18%). Identification of germ-line predispositions to malignancy provides insight for individualized treatment and screening/surveillance opportunities for family members. Introduction: Although multiple predispositions to hematologic malignancies exist, evaluations for hereditary cancer syndromes (HCS) are underperformed by most hematologist/oncologists. Criteria for initiating HCS evaluation are poorly defined, and results of genetic testing for hereditary hematologic malignancies have not been systematically reported. Patients and Methods: From April 2014 to August 2015, 67 patients were referred to the Hereditary Hematologic Malignancy Clinic (HHMC). Referral reasons included (1) bone marrow failure or myelodysplastic syndrome in patients <= 50 years, (2) evaluation for germ-line inheritance of identified RUNX1, GATA2, or CEBPA mutations on targeted next-generation sequencing panels, and (3) strong personal and/or family history of malignancy. Cultured skin fibroblasts were utilized for germ-line DNA in all patients with hematologic malignancy. Results: Eight patients (12%) were clinically diagnosed with a HCS: 4 patients with RUNX1-related familial platelet disorder (FPD)/acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and 1 patient each with dyskeratosis congenita, Fanconi anemia, germ-line DDX41, and Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS). Two patients with concern for FPD/AML and LFS, respectively, had RUNX1 and TP53 variants of unknown significance. Additionally, 4 patients with prior HCS diagnosis (1 LFS, 3 FPD/AML) were referred for further evaluation and surveillance. Conclusion: In this HHMC-referred hematologic malignancy cohort, HCS was confirmed in 12 patients (18%). HCS identification provides insight for improved and individualized treatment, as well as screening/surveillance opportunities for family members. The HHMC has facilitated HCS diagnosis; with increased clinical awareness of hematologic malignancy predisposition syndromes, more patients who may benefit from evaluation can be identified. Mutation panels intended for prognostication may provide increased clinical suspicion for germ-line testing. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available