4.7 Article

Evaluation of biogenic amines and microbial composition in the Chinese traditional fermented food grasshopper sub shrimp paste

Journal

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 134, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109979

Keywords

Grasshopper sub-shrimp paste; Biogenic amines; Microbial diversity; Halophilic bacteria; Correlation analysis

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFC1600403]
  2. Liaoning Province's Program for Promoting Liaoning Talents [XLYC1808034]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province [20180550157]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The presence of biogenic amines (BAs) in fermented foods represents a health risk for consumers. Therefore, understanding how BAs are accumulated would enable better control of their content in fermented foods. In this study, the BA profiles of grasshopper sub shrimp pastes produced in different typical regions (Panjin, Rongcheng, Shouguang, Dalian, Tangshan, Qinhuangdao and Yantai) around the Bohai Sea were evaluated. Among the microbial diversity found in the shrimp pastes, Tetragenococcus, Lactobacillus, Aspergillus and unclassified k Fungi were the predominant genera. The results of RDA correlations between physicochemical-microbial indexes and BAs suggested that the high BAs content in shrimp paste might be linked to the salinity of products and halophilic bacteria present in shrimp paste. A total of 442 strains of halophilic bacteria were identified and the five most abundant genera were Bacillus, Staphylococcus, Tetragenococcus, Virgibacillus and Oceanobacillus. Among these, 95.10% of species could produce BAs although their production appeared to vary greatly, with 30 strains considered as high producers, achieving a BA concentration of 787.54 +/- 20.87 mg/kg. Thus, controlling these bacteria might be the key to controlling the BA content in the shrimp paste.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available