4.7 Article

Antioxidant and antibacterial activities of cassava starch and whey protein blend films containing rambutan peel extract and cinnamon oil for active packaging

Journal

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 130, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109573

Keywords

Food packaging; Edible film; Antioxidant; Antimicrobial; Starch; Whey protein

Funding

  1. Kasetsart University Research and Development Institute (KURDI), Thailand

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Blending of cassava starch and whey protein isolate (WPI) films containing plant extracts showed modified properties and release behaviors. Effects of native starch (NS) and acetylated starch (AS) on film properties, antioxidant and antibacterial activities were investigated. WPI and WPI-starch films contained ethanolic fractions of rambutan peel extract (RPE) and cinnamon oil (CO). Mechanical, physical and water barrier properties of blend films depended on starch type and contents. Corilagin and (E)-cinnamaldehyde were the highest active components in RPE and CO, respectively. FTIR revealed hydrophobic interaction and hydrogen bonding between starch-protein-polyphenols. Protein conformation was altered giving modified amide I and amide II bands. Active compounds reduced water vapor permeability depending on starch types that governed CO dispersion. Starch, particularly AS, enhanced release of polyphenols and DPPH. scavenging activity in water and 50% ethanol. Antibacterial activity of the blend films differed between in vitro (disc diffusion method) and real food (salami) and was governed by the phenolic release and food components, respectively. WPI films showed the lowest in vitro antibacterial activity but the highest efficacy to delay microbial growth in salami. Release mechanism controlled the antioxidant capacity of active protein-starch films, whereas antibacterial capacity in foods strongly depended on food matrix components.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available