4.5 Article

Outcomes of Primary Versus Salvage Surgery for Sinonasal Malignancies: APopulation-BasedAnalysis

Journal

LARYNGOSCOPE
Volume 131, Issue 3, Pages E710-E718

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/lary.28925

Keywords

Sinonasal malignancies; salvage surgery; sinonasal recurrence; multimodal treatment; survival prognosis; National Cancer Database

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the overall survival outcomes for primary surgery versus salvage surgery in sinonasal malignancy patients, finding that primary surgery resulted in improved survival outcomes. Salvage surgery may be more necessary for cases such as sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma.
Objectives/Hypothesis There exists a lack of consensus on the optimal sequence of treatment for many sinonasal malignancies (SNMs). This study compares the overall survival (OS) outcomes for primary surgery (PS) versus salvage surgery (SS) in SNM patients across stage, histology, and primary site. Study Design Retrospective database review. Methods The National Cancer Database was queried for all SNM cases treated with multimodal surgical and nonsurgical therapy between 2004 and 2015. Logistic regression identified predictors of SS. Cox proportional hazards models evaluated predictors of mortality, and Kaplan-Meier log-rank test assessed OS outcomes. Results Our SNM cohort consisted of 3,011 patients (PS = 2,804; SS = 207). SS patients had significantly longer postoperative hospital stays (P= .009) and increased rates of 30-day (P < .001) and 90-day mortality (P < .001) compared to PS. On multivariate logistic regression, predictors of undergoing SS included sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma histology (odds ratio = 2.72; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16-6.66;P= .024). On multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses among SS patients, late-stage disease (hazard ratio [HR] = 4.80; 95% CI: 1.46-15.8;P= .01) and positive surgical margins (HR = 2.31; 95% CI: 1.29-4.13;P= .005) portended significantly worse OS. In the propensity score-matched cohort controlling for stage and histology, PS had significantly improved OS compared to SS (P= .007). Compared to SS, PS also had improved OS in subgroup analyses for patients with late-stage disease (P= .026) and squamous cell carcinoma histology (P= .006). Conclusions In our SMN cohort, PS resulted in improved OS outcomes compared to SS independent of stage and histology. Consideration may be given to primary surgical resection for SMN whenever feasible, though a targeted, individualized approach is warranted. Level of Evidence 3Laryngoscope, 2020

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available