4.5 Article

Identification of Viruses in Patients With Postviral Olfactory Dysfunction by Multiplex Reverse-Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction

Journal

LARYNGOSCOPE
Volume 131, Issue 1, Pages 158-164

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/lary.28997

Keywords

Olfaction disorders; multiplex polymerase chain reaction; respiratory tract infections; virus

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of the government of China [81271062]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rhinovirus and coronavirus are more commonly identified in patients with PVOD. Nasal obstruction is the most common symptom experienced by approximately 71.0% of patients.
Objectives/Hypothesis To investigate causative viruses in patients with postviral olfactory disorders (PVOD). Study Design Case-control study. Methods One hundred fifty-one consecutive patients diagnosed with PVOD were enrolled, and samples from 38 patients who visited the doctor within 3 months of symptom onset were collected and analyzed. Thirty-two individuals who underwent surgery for nasal septal deviation during the same time period were collected as the control group. The Sniffin' Sticks psychophysical olfactory test was used to evaluate olfactory function. Olfactory cleft specimens were collected using nasopharyngeal flocked swabs (COPAN FLOQSwabs). Eighteen viruses were tested for with the Luminex xTAG RVP FAST v2 Assay Kit. Results Out of the 38 patients with PVOD, rhinoviruses were detected in 13 patients, and coronavirus OC43 was detected in one patient. The frequency of positive virus detection in the patients with anosmia was higher than in those with hyposmia (58.8% vs. 19.0%,P= 0.018). In control group, rhinovirus was identified in one patient (3.1%). Nasal obstruction was the most common symptom and was experienced by 71.0% of patients. Conclusions Rhinovirus and coronavirus are more commonly identified in PVOD. Our methods represent an approach to screen for viruses that may be involved in PVOD. Level of Evidence 4Laryngoscope, 2020

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available