4.6 Article

Carbonated Water Droplet Can Ease Dust Mitigation from Hydrophobic Surfaces

Journal

LANGMUIR
Volume 36, Issue 35, Pages 10504-10518

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c01702

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research at King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM) [IN 171001]
  2. King Abdullah City for Atomic and Renewable Energy (K. A. CARE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbonated water droplets can ease the difficulties faced by distilled water droplets mitigating dust particles from hydrophobic surfaces. Rising of CO2 bubbles in carbonated water droplets and their interaction with the flow structure, created by Marangoni and buoyancy possessions, in droplets are investigated. Spreading and infusion (cloaking) of carbonated water on dust surfaces are analyzed, and the rate at which bubbles formed inside the carbonated water droplet, as placed on a dusty hydrophobic surface, is examined. Flow structures formed inside the carbonated water droplet are simulated, and findings are compared to those corresponding to the distilled water droplet. Dust mitigation from the hydrophobic surface toward droplet liquid inside is evaluated using the high-speed recording system, and the results are compared with those of predictions. It is found that carbonated water spreads and infuses onto dust particles at a higher rate than that at which distilled water does. The rising bubble generates wake-like flow in the fluid while modifying the flow structure inside the droplet; hence, the number of circulating structures increases from two to four in droplet fluid. The dust particles picked up by flow currents are redistributed over the entire carbonated water droplet, while mitigated dust particles remain in the lower region of the distilled water droplet. Bubbles formed inside the carbonated water droplet improve dust lifting and rate of dust mitigation from the surface.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available