4.6 Article

From Protein Corona to Colloidal Self-Assembly: The Importance of Protein Size in Protein-Nanoparticle Interactions

Journal

LANGMUIR
Volume 36, Issue 28, Pages 8218-8230

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c01334

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CEA Programme de Toxicologie (NaToM grant)
  2. CFR grant from the CEA
  3. French Infrastructure for Integrated Structural Biology (FRISBI) [ANR-10-INBS-05]
  4. Investissements d'Avenir LabEx PALM [ANR-10LABX-0039-PALM]
  5. French METSA network (FR3507)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Protein adsorption on nanoparticles is an important field of study, particularly with regard to nanomedicine and nanotoxicology. Many factors can influence the composition and structure of the layer(s) of adsorbed proteins, the so-called protein corona. However, the role of protein size has not been specifically investigated, although some evidence has indicated its potential important role in corona composition and structure. To assess the role of protein size, we studied the interactions of hemoproteins (spanning a large size range) with monodisperse silica nanoparticles. We combined various techniques-adsorption isotherms, isothermal titration calorimetry, circular dichroism, and transmission electron cryomicroscopy-to address this issue. Overall, the results show that small proteins behaved as typical model proteins, forming homogeneous monolayers on the nanoparticle surface (protein corona). Their adsorption is purely enthalpy-driven, with subtle structural changes. In contrast, large proteins interact with nanoparticles via entropy-driven mechanisms. Their structure is completely preserved during adsorption, and any given protein can directly bind to several nanoparticles, forming bridges in these newly formed protein-nanoparticle assemblies. Protein size is clearly an overlooked factor that should be integrated into proteomics and toxicological studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available