4.8 Article

Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in Spain (ENE-COVID): a nationwide, population-based seroepidemiological study

Journal

LANCET
Volume 396, Issue 10250, Pages 535-544

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31483-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Health, the Institute of Health Carlos III (Ministry of Science and Innovation)
  2. National Health System
  3. Servicio Andaluz de Salud
  4. Servicio Aragones de Salud
  5. Servicio de Salud del Principado de Asturias
  6. Servei de Salut Illes Balears
  7. Servicio Canario de la Salud
  8. Servicio Cantabro de Salud
  9. Servicio de Salud de Castilla-La Mancha
  10. Servicio de Salud de Castilla y Leon
  11. Servei Catala de Salut
  12. Conselleria de Sanitat Universal i Salut Publica de la Generalitat Valenciana
  13. Servicio Extremeno de Salud
  14. Servizo Galego de Saude
  15. Servicio Riojano de Salud
  16. Servicio Madrileno de Salud
  17. Servicio Murciano de Salud
  18. Servicio Navarro de Salud-Osasunbidea
  19. Instituto de Salud Publica y Laboral de Navarra
  20. Servicio Vasco de Salud-Osakidetza
  21. Instituto de Gestion Sanitaria

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Spain is one of the European countries most affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Serological surveys are a valuable tool to assess the extent of the epidemic, given the existence of asymptomatic cases and little access to diagnostic tests. This nationwide population-based study aims to estimate the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Spain at national and regional level. Methods 35 883 households were selected from municipal rolls using two-stage random sampling stratified by province and municipality size, with all residents invited to participate. From April 27 to May 11, 2020, 61 075 participants (75.1% of all contacted individuals within selected households) answered a questionnaire on history of symptoms compatible with COVID-19 and risk factors, received a point-of-care antibody test, and, if agreed, donated a blood sample for additional testing with a chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay. Prevalences of IgG antibodies were adjusted using sampling weights and post-stratification to allow for differences in non-response rates based on age group, sex, and census-tract income. Using results for both tests, we calculated a seroprevalence range maximising either specificity (positive for both tests) or sensitivity (positive for either test). Findings Seroprevalence was 5.0% (95% CI 4.7-5.4) by the point-of-care test and 4.6% (4.3-5.0) by immunoassay, with a specificity-sensitivity range of 3.7% (3.3-4.0; both tests positive) to 6.2% (5.8-6.6; either test positive), with no differences by sex and lower seroprevalence in children younger than 10 years (<3.1% by the point-of-care test). There was substantial geographical variability, with higher prevalence around Madrid (>10%) and lower in coastal areas (<3%). Seroprevalence among 195 participants with positive PCR more than 14 days before the study visit ranged from 87.6% (81.1-92.1; both tests positive) to 91.8% (86.3-95.3; either test positive). In 7273 individuals with anosmia or at least three symptoms, seroprevalence ranged from 15.3% (13.8-16.8) to 19.3% (17.7-21.0). Around a third of seropositive participants were asymptomatic, ranging from 21.9% (19.1-24.9) to 35.8% (33.1-38.5). Only 19.5% (16.3-23.2) of symptomatic participants who were seropositive by both the point-of-care test and immunoassay reported a previous PCR test. Interpretation The majority of the Spanish population is seronegative to SARS-CoV-2 infection, even in hotspot areas. Most PCR-confirmed cases have detectable antibodies, but a substantial proportion of people with symptoms compatible with COVID-19 did not have a PCR test and at least a third of infections determined by serology were asymptomatic. These results emphasise the need for maintaining public health measures to avoid a new epidemic wave. Copyright (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available