4.7 Article

Data alignments in machinery remaining useful life prediction using deep adversarial neural networks

Journal

KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS
Volume 197, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2020.105843

Keywords

Remaining useful life prediction; Rotating machines; Deep learning; Adversarial training; Data alignment

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China [N2005010, N180703018, N180708009, N170308028]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11902202]
  3. Key Laboratory of Vibration and Control of Aero-Propulsion System Ministry of Education, Northeastern University, China [VCAME201906]
  4. Department of Science and Technology of Liaoning Province, China [2019BS-184]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, intelligent data-driven machinery prognostics and health management have been attracting increasing attention due to the great merits of high accuracy, fast response and easy implementation. While promising prognostic performance has been achieved, the first predicting time for remaining useful life is generally difficult to be determined, and the data distribution discrepancy between different machines is mostly ignored, which leads to deterioration in prognostics. In this paper, a deep learning-based prognostic method is proposed to address the problems. Generative adversarial networks are used to learn the distributions of data in machine healthy states, and a health indicator is proposed to determine the first predicting time. Afterwards, adversarial training is further introduced to achieve data alignments of different machine entities in order to extract generalized prognostic knowledge. Experiments of remaining useful life prediction on two rotating machinery datasets are implemented, and the promising prognostic results validate the effectiveness of the proposed method. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available