Journal
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages 517-526Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-06226-8
Keywords
Computer assisted surgery; Total knee arthroplasty; Distal femoral rotation; Balanced TKA
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study found that variable femoral component rotation does not affect clinical outcomes in balanced TKA.
Purpose Excessive internal and external rotation of the femoral component has been associated with poor outcome with a measured-resection neutral mechanical alignment TKA. This technique assumes that every tibia is in 3 degrees of varus so the femoral component is placed in 3 degrees of external rotation relative to the posterior condylar axis to enable a balanced flexion gap. This is not the case as there is wide variability in the bony anatomy and soft tissue envelope of the knee so flexion imbalance may occur. A patient-specific alignment navigated balanced TKA technique was performed whereby the tibia is cut anatomically up to 3 degrees of varus, then a ligament tensor is used to determine the optimal femoral component position for a balanced TKA. This results in variable femoral rotation. The hypothesis is that matching the femoral component rotation to the patient's anatomic tibial cut and soft tissue envelope will not affect clinical outcome Methods In a single surgeon series 287 consecutive varus aligned TKA's were performed using this technique with an Attune cruciate retaining fixed bearing TKA with an anatomic patella resurfacing. The angle between the posterior femoral cuts and the posterior condylar axis was collected using Brainlab software. Functional scores were collected prospectively preoperatively and at two years. The variable femoral component rotation was correlated with and compared with the functional outcome scores. Results The femoral rotation varied from 7 degrees of internal rotation to 8 degrees of external rotation relative to the posterior condylar axis. The mean rotation was 1.1 degrees of external rotation. There was no significant difference in the Oxford score, WOMAC score, Forgotten Knee Score, KOOS Joint Replacement score or Patient Satisfaction in respect to the variable femoral rotation relative to the posterior condylar axis. Conclusion When a more anatomic-balanced TKA technique is used variable femoral rotation will not affect clinical outcome at two years
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available