4.5 Article

The acromiohumeral distance in the MRI should not be used as a decision criterion to assess subacromial space width in shoulders with an intact rotator cuff

Journal

KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY
Volume 29, Issue 7, Pages 2085-2089

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-06090-6

Keywords

Acromiohumeral distance; MRI; Impingement; Rotator cuff tear; Arthroscopy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The acromiohumeral distance is significantly smaller on MRI compared to AP radiographs in shoulders with an intact rotator cuff, indicating that MRI should not be used as the sole criterion for assessing glenohumeral centering or subacromial space width.
Purpose The acromiohumeral distance is in practice often evaluated on MRI by radiologists and a reduction diagnosed as subacromial impingement. However, the acromiohumeral distance as indicator for a decentered glenohumeral joint is defined on a true AP radiograph with the patient standing or sitting. The present study therefore evaluated the influence of the patient position by comparing the acromiohumeral distance in both modalities in shoulders with an intact rotator cuff. Methods On MRI images and true AP radiographs of patients > 20 and < 80 years with an intact rotator cuff the acromiohumeral distance was measured. The maximum cranio-caudal size of the glenoid was measured as a reference to allow a direct comparison of both modalities. Results Two-hundred and thirty-four shoulders (mean patients age 45.8 +/- 14.3 years) were included. The mean acromiohumeral distance/glenoid size ratio of all shoulders was significantly larger (P < 0.0001) on the MRI with 4.6 +/- 1.0 in comparison to 4.1 +/- 0.9 in the radiographs indicating a smaller acromiohumeral distance on the MRI. In absolute values, a mean acromiohumeral distance of 9.2 mm +/- 1.8 on MRI in comparison to 10.4 mm +/- 2.4 on the radiographs was calculated. Herewith, the acromiohumeral distance in the MRI was in the average 1.2 mm +/- 2.1 (13%) smaller than the in corresponding radiographs (P < 0.0001). Conclusion The acromiohumeral distance is significantly smaller in the MRI in comparison to AP radiographs in shoulders with an intact rotator cuff and should not be used as a decision criterion on MRI to assess glenohumeral centering or subacromial space width.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available