4.4 Review

COVID-19 and ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-summary of the literature

Journal

JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND THROMBOLYSIS
Volume 50, Issue 3, Pages 587-595

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11239-020-02228-y

Keywords

Antiphospholipid antibodies; COVID-19; Hypercoagulable; Ischemic stroke; Thrombosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a life-threatening complication of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. Increasing reports suggest an association between COVID-19 and AIS, although the underlying mechanism remains uncertain. We performed a systematic review to characterize the clinical characteristics, neuroimaging findings, and outcomes of AIS in COVID-19 patients. A literature search was performed in PubMed and Embase using a suitable keyword search strategy from 1st December 2019 to 29th May 2020. All studies reporting AIS occurrence in COVID-19 patients were included. A total of 39 studies comprising 135 patients were studied. The pooled incidence of AIS in COVID-19 patients from observational studies was 1.2% (54/4466) with a mean age of 63.4 +/- 13.1 years. The mean duration of AIS from COVID-19 symptoms onset was 10 +/- 8 days, and the mean NIHSS score was 19 +/- 8. Laboratory investigations revealed an elevated meand-dimer (9.2 +/- 14.8 mg/L) and fibrinogen (5.8 +/- 2.0 g/L). Antiphospholipid antibodies were detected in a significant number of cases. The majority of AIS neuroimaging patterns observed was large vessel thrombosis, embolism or stenosis (62.1%, 64/103), followed by multiple vascular territory (26.2%, 27/103). A high mortality rate was reported (38.0%, 49/129). We report the pooled incidence of AIS in COVID-19 patients to be 1.2%, with a high mortality rate. Elevatedd-dimer, fibrinogen and the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies appear to be prominent in COVID-19 patients with concomitant AIS, but further mechanistic studies are required to elucidate their role in pathogenesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available