4.7 Article

Usage of supplementary cementitious materials: advantages and limitations Part I. C-S-H, C-A-S-H and other products formed in different binding mixtures

Journal

JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY
Volume 142, Issue 1, Pages 371-393

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-020-09907-1

Keywords

Supplementary cementitious materials; Cement; Blended cement; Pozzolana; Hydration; Thermal analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is well known that cement production is not neutral for natural environment among others due to high CO(2)emission. Different strategies of mitigation of negative environmental impact of its production are developed. One of the ways is utilization of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) in the manufacture of cement and concrete. Introduction of aluminosilicate SCMs into binding mixture makes that more amount of so-called C-A-S-H phase appears in hydration products, affecting microstructure and properties of final hardened composite. The aim of this work is to discuss the possibilities of utilization of selected SCMs in different binding mixtures including some advantages and limitations. Literature review on the subject was carried out. Some of our own research results were also presented. In the Part I of this review, some information about history of ancient binding materials and the possibilities of inspiring modern engineers with ancient constructions in the aspect of using SCMs in modern concrete were presented. Using pozzolanic aluminosilicate SCMs in relation to their influence on formed products, microstructure and mechanical properties of hardened material were discussed. Some problems with possibilities of study of SCMs reaction degree were identified. Emphasis was put on the usefulness of isothermal calorimetry and thermal analysis for investigations of hydration process and identification of hydrated products as well as evaluation of degree of reaction of SCMs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available