4.4 Article

The Pelvis and Beyond: Musculoskeletal Tender Points in Women With Chronic Pelvic Pain

Journal

CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN
Volume 32, Issue 8, Pages 659-665

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000307

Keywords

bladder pain syndrome; chronic pelvic pain; tender points; myofascial pain; interstitial cystitis

Funding

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD, (NIDDK) [R01DK083538]
  2. Advancing a Healthier Wisconsin Endowment Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI [5520298]
  3. Building Interdisciplinary Research Career in Women's Health [K12MD43489]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective:To determine the feasibility of a detailed pain sensitivity assessment using body-wide musculoskeletal tender points (TPs) in women with different types of chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and compare phenotypic differences.Materials and Methods:Seventy women with CPP and 35 pain-free women underwent musculoskeletal evaluation of TPs in the pelvic floor, abdomen, groin, inner thigh, and all 18 fibromyalgia TPs. Patients scored elicited pain on a numeric rating scale. TP pain scores were used for intergroup comparison and intragroup correlation.Results:Women with CPP were grouped as having either bladder pain syndrome (BPS, n=24) or myofascial pelvic pain (MPP, n=11) singularly or both concomitantly (BPS+MPP, n=35). TP pain scores for all evaluations were higher in women with CPP compared with healthy women (P<0.001). Women with BPS+MPP had elevated TP pain for each evaluation compared with women with BPS alone. Pelvic floor and fibromyalgia TP scores correlated strongly in the MPP group, moderately in the BPS+MPP group, and weakly in the BPS alone group. Although some moderate and strong correlations between different body locations were present in all 3 groups, only the BPS+MPP group showed moderate to strong correlations between all body TPs.Conclusions:Detailed musculoskeletal evaluation of women with CPP is feasible and well tolerated. Careful phenotyping differentiated BPS, MPP, and BPS+MPP groups. Attending to the differences between these groups clinically may lead to more effective treatment strategies and improved outcomes for patients with CPP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available