4.5 Article

Estimating costs and benefits of stroke management: A population-based simulation model

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY
Volume 72, Issue 9, Pages 2122-2134

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2020.1772018

Keywords

System dynamics; stroke; health systems

Funding

  1. Singapore Ministry of Health's National Medical Research Council under its STaR Award [NMRCjSTaRj0005j2009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper illustrates how a system dynamics approach can assist in strategic planning for healthcare services, particularly in evaluating a comprehensive package of stroke care interventions in Singapore. By using a population-level system dynamics model to investigate various intervention scenarios, the study emphasizes the importance of care coordination for stroke patients and confirms the economic value of current stroke interventions.
The paper demonstrates how a system dynamics approach can support strategic planning of health care services and can in particular help to balance cost-effectiveness considerations with budget impact considerations when assessing a comprehensive package of stroke care interventions in Singapore. A population-level system dynamics model is used to investigate 12 intervention scenarios based on six stroke interventions (a public information campaign, thrombolysis, endovascular therapy, acute stroke unit (ASU), out-of-hospital rehabilitation, and secondary prevention). Primary outcomes included cumulative discounted costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained, as well as cumulative net monetary benefit by 2030. All intervention scenarios result in an increase in net monetary benefit by 2030; much of these gains were realized through improved post-acute care. Findings highlight the importance of coordination of care, and affirms the economic value of current stroke interventions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available