Journal
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 62, Issue 6, Pages 683-694Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cid/civ948
Keywords
hepatitis C; sustained virologic response; recurrence; relapse; reinfection
Categories
Funding
- UNITAID
- Biomedical Research Centre of Imperial College National Health Service trust
- Medical Research Council (MRC) STOP hepatitis C virus (HCV) consortium
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background. Treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) can lead to sustained virological response (SVR) in over 90% of people. Subsequent recurrence of HCV, either from late relapse or reinfection, reverses the beneficial effects of SVR. Methods. A search identified studies analysing HCV recurrence post-SVR. The recurrence rate for each study was calculated using events/person years of follow-up (PYFU). Results were pooled using a random-effects model and used to calculate 5-year recurrence risk. Three patient groups were analysed: (1) Mono-HCV infected low-risk patients; (2) Mono-HCV infected high-risk patients (injecting drug users or prisoners); (3) human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/HCV coinfected patients. Recurrence was defined as confirmed HCV RNA detectability post-SVR. Results. In the 43 studies of HCV mono-infected low-risk patients (n = 7969) the pooled recurrence rate was 1.85/1000 PYFU (95% confidence interval [CI],.71-3.35; I-2 = 73%) leading to a summary 5-year recurrence risk of 0.95% (95% CI,.35%-1.69%). For the 14 studies of HCV monoinfected high-risk patients (n = 771) the pooled recurrence rate was 22.32/1000 PYFU (95% CI, 13.07-33.46; I-2 = 27%) leading to a summary 5-year risk of 10.67% (95% CI, 6.38%-15.66%). For the 4 studies of HIV/HCV coinfected patients the pooled recurrence rate was 32.02/1000 PYFU (95% CI,.00-123.49; I-2 = 96%) leading to a summary 5-year risk of 15.02% (95% CI,.00%-48.26%). The higher pooled estimates of recurrence in the high-risk and coinfected cohorts were driven by an increase in reinfection rather than late relapse. Conclusions. SVR appears durable in the majority of patients at 5 years post-treatment. The large difference in 5 year event rate by risk group is driven mainly by an increased reinfection risk.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available