4.6 Article

Enhanced healing of rat calvarial defects with 3D printed calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite/collagen/bone morphogenetic protein 2 scaffolds

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103782

Keywords

Bone morphogenetic Protein-2; Collagen; Calcium deficient hydroxyapatite; Calvarial bone defect; In vivo study

Funding

  1. Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE, Korea) under Industrial Technology Innovation Program [10063541]
  2. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [10063541] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we mainly to evaluate the newly formed bone using the Calcium deficient hydroxyapatite (CDHA)/collagen-based bio-ceramic scaffold as Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 (BMP-2) carrier in rat calvarial criticalsized bone defect. In the real-time PCR analysis, the CDHA/collagen scaffold loaded rhBMP-2 group showed significantly enhanced results of bone-related gene expression (p < 0.05). In the in vivo study, the micro-CT showed that the main bone formation parameters of percent bone volume and trabecular number of the two experiment groups (CDHA/Collagen (CDHA) group, BV/TV: 14.21 +/- 3.20, Tb.N: 2.37 +/- 0.50; CDHA/Collagen/rhBMP-2(BMP) group, BV/TV: 14.51 +/- 3.12, Tb.N: 2.75 +/- 0.65) were significantly higher than those of the control (Blank, BV/TV: 3.25 +/- 1.25, Tb.N: 0.57 +/- 0.20) group (p < 0.05). Although there was no significant difference between the two experimental groups, the BMP group results were slightly higher than those of the CDHA group (p > 0.05). Moreover, the histological results also supported the micro-CT results. The scaffold of CDHA/collagen seems to be a suitable bio-ceramic carrier loaded rhBMP-2, and appears to enhance new bone formation and bone regeneration in bone defect after implantation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available