4.7 Review

Global Childhood Deaths From Pertussis: A Historical Review

Journal

CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 63, Issue -, Pages S134-S141

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciw529

Keywords

pertussis; childhood deaths; review

Funding

  1. Australian Government Department of Health
  2. New South Wales Ministry of Health
  3. Children's Hospital at Westmead
  4. National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia) [1054414]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Impact of pertussis vaccines onmortality is a keyWorldHealth Organization indicator, and trends inmortality rates and age distribution can inform maternal immunization strategies. We systematically reviewed studies reporting pertussis mortality rates (PMRs) per million population, identifying 19 eligible studies. During a prevaccine observation period of >= 50 years in high-income countries (HICs), PMRs reduced in both infants and 1- to 4-year-olds by >80%, along with improvements in living conditions. In studies in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs), PMRs resembled highest prevaccine HIC rates. Postvaccine in HICs, significant further reduction in deaths (>98%) occurred, but with a large left shift in age of onset among residual deaths. Postvaccine in LMICs, limited data also show large and rapid decreases in PMRs, first in older infants and children, but long-term data fully enumerating residual deaths are lacking. In Sweden, large increases in the prevalence of undetectable pertussis antibodies were found at 10 years after high childhood coverage of acellular pertussis vaccines. Such data are not available from LMICs using whole-cell vaccines in a primary schedule without boosters. Data on residual infant deaths and maternal seroprevalence would be valuable inputs into consideration of pertussis vaccination in pregnancy in LMIC settings, especially if more precise immune correlates of infant protection against death from pertussis were known.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available