4.7 Article

Applicability of Hepatitis C Virus RNA Viral Load Thresholds for 8-Week Treatments in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 Infection

Journal

CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 62, Issue 10, Pages 1228-1234

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciw061

Keywords

hepatitis C virus; HCV RNA assay; baseline viral load; Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan; Abbott RealTime HCV

Funding

  1. Abbott
  2. AbbVie
  3. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  4. Covidien
  5. Gilead
  6. Janssen-Cilag
  7. Merck/Merck Sharp Dohme (MSD)
  8. Roche
  9. Janssen
  10. Merck
  11. Theravance
  12. Merck/MSD
  13. Boehringer
  14. Novartin
  15. Novartis
  16. Tibotec
  17. Vertex
  18. Qiagen
  19. Siemens
  20. Achillion
  21. Fujirebio
  22. GlaxoSmithKline
  23. Transgene

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Interferon-free treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection may be shortened to 8 weeks in treatment-naive, noncirrhotic patients with baseline HCV RNA levels of <4 or <6 million (M) IU/mL based on post-hoc analyses of phase 3 trial data. The applicability of these viral load thresholds in clinical practice is unknown. Methods. Pretreatment and on-treatment serum samples (n = 740) from patients with HCV genotype 1 infection were included for HCV RNA analysis with 2 widely used assays, Cobas AmpliPrep/CobasTaqMan (CAP/CTM) and Abbott RealTime HCV (ART) assays. Results. HCV RNA levels were significantly higher with CAP/CTM than with ART (overall difference, +0.11 log(10) IU/mL; P < .001). In treatment-naive, noncirrhotic patients, discordance rates around the clinical cutoffs at 4M and 6M IU/mL were 23% and 18%, respectively. The mean differences between assays in discordant samples were 0.38 (4M) and 0.41 (6M) log(10) IU/mL, respectively. Overall, 87% and 95% of treatment-naive, noncirrhotic patients, respectively, had baseline HCV RNA levels below 4M and 6M IU/mL with ART. These rates were significantly higher than those measured with CAP/CTM (64% and 78%, respectively; P < .001). Finally, discordance rates around the proposed thresholds in 2 consecutive samples of the same patient were in the range of 1%-2% for ART and 13%-17% for CAP/CTM. Conclusions. Selection of patients for 8-week regimens on the basis of a single HCV RNA determination may not be reliable because viral load levels around the proposed clinical thresholds show significant interassay and intrapatient variability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available