4.4 Article

Numerical analysis of the influence of magnetic field waveforms on the performance of active magnetic regenerators

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s40430-020-02453-9

Keywords

Magnetic refrigeration; Active magnetic regenerator; Numerical modeling; Magnetocaloric effect

Funding

  1. INCT (National Institutes of Science and Technology) Program
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [443696/2014-4]
  3. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (FAPESC) [2018TR1576]
  4. CAPES (Talents for Innovation Program) [88887.194773/2018-00]
  5. NIDEC-GA
  6. CODEMGE

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Magnetic cooling is an alternative to vapor compression that does not rely on the use of hazardous substances. The refrigerant is a solid material which reacts to oscillations in magnetic field by changing its temperature (the magnetocaloric effect). In active magnetic regenerators, the magnetocaloric material arranged as a porous medium is subjected to an oscillating fluid flow to allow heat transfer from a cold source to a hot sink in a thermodynamic cooling cycle. Although the literature is abundant with studies on the influence of the fluid flow waveform on magnetic refrigeration devices, the influence of the magnetic field waveform has been much less investigated. In this work, we make use of an active magnetic regenerator numerical model with different mathematically defined waveforms to determine which operating parameters yield the highest values of cooling capacity and coefficient of performance for a specific set of operating conditions. The results show that the best performance is achieved when the magnetic field is kept constant for the same time duration of the fluid flow through the magnetized material, and the transition times between the high and low levels of the magnetic field should be as short as possible.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available