Journal
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 251, Issue -, Pages 275-280Publisher
ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.02.014
Keywords
Surgical education; Breast surgical oncology; Multidisciplinary care; Graduate medical education
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background: Treating patients with breast cancer is multidisciplinary; however, it is unclear whether surgery residency programs provide sufficient training in multidisciplinary care. Self-efficacy is one way of measuring the adequacy of training. Our goal was to develop a method of assessing self-efficacy in multidisciplinary breast cancer care. Methods: Based on a literature review and subject-matter expert input, we developed a 30item self-efficacy survey to measure six domains of breast cancer care (genetics, surgery, medical oncology, radiation oncology, pathology, and radiology). We constructed and validated the survey using a seven-step survey development framework. The survey was administered to general surgery residents at a single academic surgical residency. Results: Response rate was 66%(n = 31). Internal consistencywas strong (Cronbach alpha = 0.92). Self-efficacywasmoderate (mean = 3.05) andtendedto increasewith training (postgraduate year [PGY] 1: mean = 2.37 versus PGY 5: mean = 3.54; P < 0.001), providing evidence for construct validity. Self-efficacywas highest in the surgery (3.56) comparedwith others (genetics 2.67, medical oncology 3, radiation oncology 2.67, pathology 2.67, and radiology 3.33). This trend was similar across all PGY groups, except for interns, whose self-efficacy in surgery was low. Conclusions: We created a survey to assess self-efficacy in multidisciplinary breast cancer care and provided initial evidence of survey validity. Although self-efficacy in surgery improved with years in training, medical and radiation oncology self-efficacy remained low. As modern breast cancer treatment is highly multidisciplinary, an expanded education program is needed to help trainees incorporate multidisciplinary clinical perspectives. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available