4.3 Article

Coulometric response characteristics of solid contact ion-selective electrodes for divalent cations

Journal

JOURNAL OF SOLID STATE ELECTROCHEMISTRY
Volume 24, Issue 11-12, Pages 2975-2983

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10008-020-04718-8

Keywords

Solid contact ISE; Divalent cations; Coulometric transduction; Charge transfer; Impedance

Funding

  1. Abo Akademi University (ABO)
  2. Academy of Finland [317829]
  3. Academy of Finland (AKA) [317829, 317829] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The chronoamperometric and coulometric response of solid contact ion-selective electrodes (SCISEs) for the detection of divalent cations was investigated in order to provide a more complete description of the mechanism of the recently introduced coulometric transduction method for SCISEs. The coulometric transduction method has earlier been employed only for SCISEs that were selective to monovalent ions. The SCISEs utilized poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) doped with poly(styrene sulfonate) (PSS-) as the solid contact (ion-to-electron transducer). PEDOT(PSS) was electrodeposited on glassy carbon and covered with plasticized PVC-based ion-selective membranes (ISMs) that were selective towards divalent cations (Ca2+, Pb2+). In contrast to earlier studies, the results obtained in this work show that the coulometric response for the Pb2+-SCISE was limited mainly by ion transport in the PEDOT(PSS) layer, which was not the case for the Ca2+-SCISE, nor was it observed earlier for the monovalent ions. The exceptional behavior of the Pb2+-SCISE was explored further by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, and it was shown that the effective redox capacitance of PEDOT(PSS) was significantly higher for the Pb2+-SCISE than for the Ca2+-SCISE although the polymerization charge of PEDOT(PSS) was the same. The slow transport of Pb(2+)in PEDOT(PSS) was tentatively related to complexation between Pb(2+)and PEDOT(PSS).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available