4.4 Review

Variation of diagnostic criteria in women with chronic endometritis and its effect on reproductive outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 140, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jri.2020.103146

Keywords

Antibiotic treatment; Chronic endometritis; Diagnostic criterion; Plasma cells; Reproductive outcomes

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81871172]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region [2018GXNSFDA050017, 2019GXNSFFA245013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the variation in the diagnostic criteria for chronic endometritis (CE) and its effect on reproductive outcomes. A search of the academic literature was conducted in various databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Chinese National Knowledge Internet. Studies published in English or Chinese prior to October 1, 2019, were included in the primary screen. Data on the CE incidence rate, cure rate after antibiotic therapy, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, and live birth rate were extracted and analyzed. Twelve eligible studies involving 1879 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with strict diagnostic criteria, studies that used broad diagnostic criteria to identify CE reported a higher incidence rate (odds radio [OR] = 2.96, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13-6.44), clinical pregnancy rate (OR = 1.83, 95 % CI: 1.18-2.8), and live birth rate (OR = 2.08, 95 % CI: 1.43-3.02). Compared with a short treatment course, a longer course of antibiotic treatment significantly improved the cure rate of CE (OR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.18-0.47). Based on these findings, variation in the diagnostic criteria may alter the incidence rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and live birth rate of women with CE. A consensus on the diagnostic criteria must be established to obtain a better understanding of and additional information about CE.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available