4.3 Review

Review of state-of-the-art battery state estimation technologies for battery management systems of stationary energy storage systems

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER ELECTRONICS
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages 1526-1540

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s43236-020-00122-7

Keywords

Rechargeable battery; Lithium-ion battery; Battery management system; State indicator; Stationary energy storage system

Funding

  1. Nuclear Safety Research Program through the Korea Foundation Of Nuclear Safety (KoFONS) from the Nuclear Safety and Security Commission (NSSC), Republic of Korea [1805006]
  2. Transportation & Logistics Research Program (TLRP) - Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transportation of the Korean government [20TLRP-C135446-01]
  3. Nuclear Safety & Security Commission (NSSC), Republic of Korea [1805006-0320-SB120] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lithium-ion batteries have recently been in the spotlight as the main energy source for the energy storage devices used in the renewable energy industry. The main issues in the use of lithium-ion batteries are satisfaction with the design life and safe operation. Therefore, battery management has been required in practice. In accordance with this demand, battery state indicators such as the state-of-charge (SOC), state-of-health (SOH), state-of-function (SOF), and state-of-temperature (SOT) have been widely applied. The use of these indicators ensures safe operation without overcharging and over-discharging. In addition, it can also help satisfy the design life. This paper presents a literature review of battery state indicators over the last three years and proposes the requirement of state-of-the-art battery state indicators. It also suggests future developments for battery management system (BMS) in stationary energy storage systems (ESSs).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available