4.6 Review

Benchmarking Bioplastics: A Natural Step Towards a Sustainable Future

Journal

JOURNAL OF POLYMERS AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Volume 28, Issue 12, Pages 3055-3075

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10924-020-01830-8

Keywords

Bioplastics; Bio-based plastics; Bioplastic policies; Plastic pollution; Bioplastic standards; Biodegradable; Global policies

Funding

  1. Association of Commonwealth Universities (ACU)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ubiquitous presence of plastic litter and its tending fate as marine debris have given rise to a strong anti-waste global movement which implicitly endorses bioplastics as a promising substitute. With 'corporate social responsibility' growing ever more popular as a business promotional tool, companies and businesses are continually making claims about their products being green, environmentally friendly, biodegradable, or 100% compostable. Imprudent use of these words creates a false sense of assurance at the consumer end about them being responsible towards the environment by choosing these products. The policies surrounding bioplastics regulation are neither stringent not enforceable at both national and international stage which indirectly allow these safe words to be used as an easy plug to validate the supposed corporate social responsibility. Similar to conventional plastics, unregulated and mismanaged bioplastics could potentially create another environmental mayhem. Therefore, it is a crucial time to harness the power of law to set applicable standards with a high threshold for the classification of bioplastics, which companies can aspire to, and customers can trust. In this review, we analyse the multifarious international bioplastics standards, critically assess the potential shortcomings and highlight how the intersection of law with science and technology is crucial towards the reform of bioplastics regulation. [GRAPHICS] .

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available