4.8 Article

In Situ Generated Silver Nanodot Forster Resonance Energy Transfer Pair Reveals Nanocage Sizes

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
Volume 11, Issue 16, Pages 6867-6872

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c01950

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Korean National Research Foundation [2018R1D1A1B07050171]
  2. NRF [2018R1D1A1B07046393]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2018R1D1A1B07046393, 2018R1D1A1B07050171] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Characterizing nanocages in macromolecules is one of the keys to understanding various biological activities and further utilizing nanocages for novel materials synthesis. However, fast and straightforward detection of the nanocage size remains challenging. Here, we present a new approach to detect the diameter of a nanocage by Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET) of luminescent silver nanodot pairs with reverse micelles as a model. Silver nanodot FRET pairs can be generated in situ from a single silver nanodot species with critical energy transfer distances, R-0, of 4.8-6.5 nm. We have applied this approach to clarify the size variation of the water nanocage in nonionic surfactant Triton X-100-based reverse micelles. FRET efficiency decreases as more water is added, indicating that the size of the reverse micelles continuously expands with water content. The silver element in the nanocage also enhances the visualization of the nanocage under cryo-TEM imaging. The diameter of the water nanocage measured with the above approach is consistent with that obtained by cryo-TEM, demonstrating that the FRET measurement of silver nanodots can be a fast and accurate tool to detect nanocage dimensions. The above demonstration allows us to apply our strategy to other protein-based nanocages.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available