4.6 Article

High-Temperature Chemical Stability of Li1.4Al0.4Ti1.6(PO4)3 Solid Electrolyte with Various Cathode Materials for Solid-State Batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 124, Issue 28, Pages 14963-14971

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c01698

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Center for Automotive Research (CAR)-Ford Motor Company Membership Project
  2. Ohio State University Institute for Materials Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In a solid-state battery (SSB) system, undesirable electrode-electrolyte interfacial reactions lead to a significant performance degradation. Herein, we performed a systematic study on the chemical stabilities between Li1.4Al0.4Ti1.6(PO4)(3) (LATP) solid electrolyte and various cathode materials at their adhesion temperatures of 500-900 degrees C. Quantitative analysis of X-ray diffraction (XRD) data using Rietveld refinement revealed that Li-concentration disparity between LATP and oxide cathode materials (e.g., layered and spinel phases) is the root cause of phase degradation at high temperatures. For example, Li migration from oxide cathodes to LATP produces multiple secondary phases including LiMPO4 olivine. In contrast, the LiFePO4 cathode severely reacted with LATP at low temperature (T < 500 degrees C) and produced an Fe-rich NASICON phase (e.g., Li3M2(PO4)(3)). The onset temperature of the phase decomposition varies with chemical compositions and crystal phases of cathodes. Increasing the cathode/electrolyte adhesion temperature offers a trade-off between the specific capacity and cycle life, as exemplified by the LiCoO2 (LCO) + LATP composite cathodes. The results in this study offer a fundamental understanding of the LATP/cathode reaction mechanism, which will serve as guidance for designing interfaces and controlling the fabrication processes of SSB cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available