4.6 Article

Qualitative and quantitative analysis of phenolic compounds by UPLC-MS/MS and biological activities of Pholidota chinensis Lindl.

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2020.113350

Keywords

Pholidota chinensis Lindl.; Phenolic composition; UPLC-MS/MS; Bioactivities; Quality marker

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81673561, 81973437]
  2. Joint National Local Engineering Research Center of Fujian
  3. Taiwan Chinese Medicine Molecular Biotechnology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pholidota chinensis Lindl. is commonly used as functional tea or folk medicine in China, but few studies have been conducted on its phenolic composition and bioactivities. This study was aimed to investigate the phenolic profiles of P. chinensis extracts by different solvents (petroleum ether, ethyl acetate, n-butanol and water) and their in vitro antioxidant, antidiabetic, and anti-inflammatory activities. The results showed that a total of 42 phenolic compounds were accurately identified, 30 of them were further quantified in P. chinensis extracts by UPLC-MS/MS. Among four extracts, ethyl acetate extract not only had the highest contents of total phenolics and 21 individual phenolic compounds, but also possessed the strongest antioxidant (DPPH, 1.43 mmol AAE/g; ABTS, 5.38 mmol TE/g; FRAP, 2.58 mmol FSHE/g), alpha-glucosidase inhibition (13.29 mmol ACAE/g) and anti-inflammation (IC50 = 18.71 mu g/ml) activities. Also, the antioxidant, antidiabetic, and anti-inflammatory activities were significantly correlated with total phenolics and individual phenolic compounds. Orientin and vitexin can be considered as the potential quality markers of P. chinensis. This study will provide a comprehensive phenolic profile of P. chinensis and relates them to their antioxidant, antidiabetic, and anti-inflammatory activities. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available