4.4 Article

Validation of low-cost models for minimal invasive surgery training of congenital diaphragmatic hernia and esophageal atresia

Journal

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY
Volume 56, Issue 3, Pages 465-470

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.05.045

Keywords

Minimal invasive surgery; Low budget models; Congenital diaphragmatic hernia; Esophageal atresia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study validated the effectiveness of two low-cost, reproducible models for training minimally invasive surgical techniques for the treatment of congenital diaphragmatic hernia and esophageal atresia. Most participants considered these models to be effective training tools.
Background: Minimal invasive surgery (MIS) is increasingly used for the correction of congenital diaphragrnatic hernia (CDH) and esophageal atresia (EA). It is important to master these complex procedures, preferably preclinically, to avoid complications. The aim of this study was to validate recently developed models to train these MIS procedures preclinically. Methods: Two low cost, reproducible models (one for CDH and one for EA) were validated during several pediatric surgical conferences and training sessions (January 2017-December 2018), used in either the LaparoscopyBoxx or EoSim simulator. Participants used one or both models and completed a questionnaire regarding their opinion on realism (face validity) and didactic value (content validity), rated on a five-point-Likert scale. Results: Of all 60 participants enrolled, 44 evaluated the EA model. All items were evaluated as significantly better than neutral, with means ranging from 3.7 to 4.1 (p < 0.001). The CDH model was evaluated by 48 participants. All items scored significantly better than neutral (means 35-3.9, p < 0.001), with exception of the haptics of the simulated diaphragm (mean 3.3, p = 0.054). Both models were considered a potent training tool (means 3.9). Conclusion: These readily available and low budget models are considered a valid and potent training tool by both experts and target group participants. Type of study: Prospective study. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available