4.4 Article

A novel ex vivo, in situ method to study the human brain through MRI and histology

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
Volume 345, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2020.108903

Keywords

Ex vivo; In situ; MRI; Histology; Brain tissue; Human brain; Registration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: MRI-histology correlation studies of the ex vivo brain mostly employ fresh, extracted (ex situ) specimens, aldehyde fixed by immersion, which has several disadvantages for MRI scanning (e.g. deformation of the organ). A minority of studies are done ex vivo-in situ (unfixed brain), requiring an MRI scanner readily available within a few hours of the time of death. New Method: We propose a new technique, exploited by anatomists, for scanning the ex vivo brain: fixation by whole body perfusion, which implies fixation of the brain in situ. This allows scanning the brain surrounded by fluids, meninges, and skull, preserving the structural relationships of the brain in vivo. To evaluate the proposed method, five heads perfused-fixed with a saturated sodium chloride solution were employed. Three sequences were acquired on a 1.5 T MRI scanner: T1weighted, T2weighted-FLAIR, and Gradient-echo. Histology analysis included immunofluorescence for myelin basic protein and neuronal nuclei. Results: All MRIs were successfully processed through a validated pipeline used with in vivo MRIs. All cases exhibited positive antigenicity for myelin and neuronal nuclei. Comparison with existing methods: All scans registered to a standard neuroanatomical template in pseudo-Talairach space more accurately than an ex vivo-ex situ scan. The time interval to scan the ex vivo brain in situ was increased to at least 10 months. Conclusions: MRI and histology study of the ex vivo-in situ brain fixed by perfusion is an alternative approach that has important procedural and practical advantages over the two standard methods to study the ex vivo brain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available